SISTEM REKOMENDASI LEMBAGA KURSUS KETERAMPILAN DAN BIMBINGAN BELAJAR DI KOYA PONTIANAK BERBASIS INTEGRASI PAIRWISE COMPARISON DAN CASE-BASED REASONING
A RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR SKILLS TRAINING INSTITUTIONS AND TUTORING CENTERS IN PONTIANAK CITY USING AN INTEGRATION OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON AND CASE-BASED REASONING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52972/hoaq.vol17no2.p231-240Keywords:
sistem rekomendasi, lembaga kursus, multi kriteria, pairwise comparison, case-based reasoningAbstract
Pemilihan lembaga kursus keterampilan dan bimbingan belajar non-formal yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan individu di Kota Pontianak sering kali terkendala oleh keterbatasan akses informasi terstruktur dan kompleksitas multi-kriteria. Sebagian besar sistem rekomendasi yang ada saat ini berfokus pada platform pembelajaran daring (online-course) dan tidak mempertimbangkan batas-batas spasial serta karakteristik fasilitas fisik secara objektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan membangun sistem rekomendasi lembaga kursus keterampilan dan bimbingan belajar non-formal berbasis web di Kota Pontianak dengan mengintegrasikan metode Pairwise Comparison (PWC) dan Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). PWC digunakan untuk pembobotan kriteria secara terstruktur berdasarkan preferensi pengguna, sedangkan CBR digunakan untuk menghitung tingkat kemiripan (similarity score) antara kasus baru dan basis pengetahuan. Hasil pengujian bobot kriteria menghasilkan nilai pembobotan yang konsisten dengan Consistency Ratio (CR) sebesar 0,0206 (<0,1). Adapun kriteria program/jnis Kursus (C1) memiliki bobot tertinggi (0,3608), biaya kursus (C2) berbobot 0,2284, fasilitas (C3) berbobot 0,1543 , lokasi/jarak (C4) berbobot 0,0807, kualitas pengajar (C5) berbobot 0,1241, dan jadwal kursus (C6) berbobot 0,0516. Pengujian sistem meliputi pengujian fungsional Black Box Testing dengan tingkat keberhasilan 100%, dan pengujian System Usability Scale (SUS) kepada 20 responden yang menghasilkan skor rata-rata 78,25 (kategori Good/ Grade B). Integrasi PWC dan CBR terbukti mampu memberikan rekomendasi lembagakursus fisik yang presisi dan fleksibel sesuai dengan kebutuhan calon peserta didik.
The selection of non-formal skills courses and tutoring institutions that suit individual needs in Pontianak City is often hampered by limited access to structured information and the complexity of the criteria used. Most existing recommendation systems focus on online learning platforms and do not objectively consider spatial boundaries and physical facility characteristics. This study aims to build a web-based recommendation system for non-formal skills courses and tutoring in Pontianak City by integrating the Pairwise Comparison (PWC) method from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). PWC is used to weight the criteria in a structured manner based on user preferences, while CBR is used to calculate the similarity score between new cases and the knowledge base. The results of the criteria weighting test produce a consistent weighting value with a Consistency Ratio (CR) of 0.0206 (<0.1). The criteria for program/course type (C1) have the highest weight (0.3608), course fee (C2) has a weight of 0.2284, facilities (C3) have a weight of 0.1543, location/distance (C4) have a weight of 0.0807, instructor quality (C5) have a weight of 0.1241, and courses schedule (C6) have a weight of 0.0516. System testing includes functional black-box testing with a success rate of 100% and usability testing using the System Usability Scale (SUS) with 20 respondents, which resulted in an average score of 78.25 (Good/Grade B category). The integration of PWC and CBR has been shown to provide precise and flexible recommendations for physical course locations based on the needs of prospective students.
References
Republik Indonesia, “Lembaga Kursus,” Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 24 Tahun 2025, 2025. Accessed: Oct. 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.go.id/files/Permendikdasmen-no-24-tahun-2025.pdf
Y. Lin, S. Feng, F. Lin, W. Zeng, Y. Liu, and P. Wu, “Adaptive Course Recommendation in MOOCs,” Knowledge Based System., vol. 224, p. 107085, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107085.
H. Ahmadian Yazdi, S. J. Seyyed Mahdavi, and H. Ahmadian Yazdi, “Dynamic Educational Recommender System Based on Improved LSTM Neural Network,” Scientific Report., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 4381, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54729-y.
B. Anthony Jnr, “A Case-Based Reasoning Recommender System for Sustainable Smart City Development,” AI & Society., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 159–183, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-00984-2.
C. Obeid and et al, “A Novel Hybrid Recommender System Approach for Student Academic Advising Named COHRS, Supported by Case-based Reasoning and Ontology,” Computer Science and Information Systems, 2022, doi: 10.2298/CSIS220215011O.
C. Lahoud and et al., “A Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology-Based Hybrid Recommender System for Student Orientation in Higher Education,” Educational technology research and development, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 2495–2522, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11423-025-10488-9.
S. Algarni and F. T. Sheldon, “Systematic Review of Recommendation Systems for Course Selection,” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 479–499, 2023, doi: 10.3390/make5020033.
K. T. N. Iman and S. Wibisono, “Pembobotan Menggunakan Pairwise Comparison Pada Case Based Reasoning Rekomendasi Hotel,” Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2021, doi:10.36595/misi.v4i1.240.
E. Kulcsár, T. Csiszér, and J. Abonyi, “MethodsX Pairwise Comparison Based Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA),” vol. 7, no. May 2019, pp. 0–7, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101007.
J. Mamcenko, E. Kurilovas, and I. Krikun, “On Application of Case-Based Reasoning to Personalise Learning,” Informatics in Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 345–358, 2019, doi: 10.15388/infedu.2019.16.
E. Hernández-Nieves and et al, “CEBRA: A Case-Based Reasoning Application to Recommend Banking Products,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 104, p. 104327, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104327.
B. Cavallo and A. Ishizaka, “Evaluating Scales for Pairwise Comparisons,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 951–965, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04682-8.
Kristina, A. M. Shiddiqi, and D. Siahaan, “Business Process Model Diagram Similarity Measurement Using Pairwise Comparison,” in 2024 23rd International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), 2024, pp. 47–52. doi: 10.1109/ISCIT63075.2024.10793688.
M. Mustofa and S. Wibisono, “CBR-AHP Penanganan Gangguan Indihome Dengan Algoritma Sorensen,” ELKOM: Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 162–170, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.51903/elkom.v15i1.794.
T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. in The analytic hierarchy process series. New York: McGraw-Hill International Book Company, 1980. Accessed: Oct. 22, 2026. [Online].
I. W. Supriana, G. A. V. M. Giri, and I. M. S. Bimantara, “Implementasi Sistem Cerdas Menggunakan Case Base Reasoning Sebagai Rujukan Terpadu Penerima Bantuan Kemiskinan di Kabupaten Tabanan,” Rekayasa Sistem Komputer, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 190–199, 2022, doi: 10.31598/jurnalresistor.v5i2.1097.
A. Aamodt and E. Plaza, “Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches,” AI Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 1994, doi: 10.3233/AIC-1994-7104.
S. Ren, F. Gui, Y. Zhao, M. Zhan, and W. Wang, “An Effective Similarity Determination Model for Case-Based Reasoning in Support of Low-Carbon Product Design,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 12, no. 10, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1687814020970313.
L. Fei and Y. Feng, “A Novel Retrieval Strategy for Case-Based Reasoning Based on Attitudinal Choquet Integral,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 94, p. 103791, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103791.
M. O. Mülâyim and J. L. Arcos, “Fast Anytime Retrieval with Confidence in Large-Scale Temporal Case Bases” Knowledge Based System, vol. 206, p. 106374, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106374.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 HOAQ (High Education of Organization Archive Quality) : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal HOAQ (High Education of Organization Archive Quality) : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi diterbitkan berdasarkan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Lisensi ini memungkinkan setiap orang untuk Berbagi: menyalin dan mendistribusikan kembali materi ini dalam format atau bentuk apapun; Adaptasi: merombak, mengubah, dan membuat turunan dari materi ini untuk keperluan apa pun, termasuk keperluan komersial, asalkan mereka memberikan pengakuan kepada Penulis Asli atas hasil karya aslinya.
