PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP, TOPSIS DAN SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING UNTUK PEMILIHAN TEMPAT WISATA DI MANGGARAI TIMUR

Authors

  • Erna Nubatonis STIKOM Uyelindo Kupang

Keywords:

AHP, Perbandingan, SAW, TOPSIS, Wisata Manggarai Timur

Abstract

The number of activities makes people want to relax and relieve fatigue from busy daily routines. Traveling is one way. Determining the destination tourist attraction is not easy. The thing that must be done first is to seek information from various sources before heading to the area you want to visit, then make a comparison to choose a tourist attraction according to the desired criteria. The ultimate goal of this research is to help visitors who visit East Manggarai to determine tourist objects that match the criteria. Thus a computer system is needed to assist tourist visitors in determining tourist attractions. In this study, the authors compare the AHP, SAW and TOPSIS methods, where the three methods show that the ranking results are not always the same because there are differences in algorithms and differences in weighting value scales. The criteria needed are entrance fees, distance, facilities, natural beauty, security and strategic locations with tourist attractions, namely Liang Lewe Beach (Lamba Leda District), Cepi Watu Beach (Borong District), Nanga Lok (Elar District), Cunca Lelo (South Lamba Leda District), Wae Wole Beach (Komba City District), Watu Pajung Beach (Sambi Rampas District), Rana Tonjong (Sambi Rampas District), Nanga Baras Beach (Sambi Rampas District), Lake Rana Mese (Kec. Rana Mese) and Cunca Radi Ntangis (Kec. Lamba Leda Timur). The final result based on the comparison of the three methods, the SAW method was determined as the best method for determining tourism in East Manggarai with the highest highest preference value assigned to code A6 with a value of 0.9677 Watu Pajung Beach tourist attraction.

References

Andharsaputri, R.L. 2017. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Penerapan Metode AHP (Analitycal Hierarchy Process) dalam Pemilihan The Best Telesales. Jurnal Bianglala Informatika [internet].[diakses 17 Juni 2021] 5(2): 77-84. Tersedia pada: https://ejournal. bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/Bianglala/article/view/2946

Cahyanul, E.T., Lestari, S.D. dan Hermawan, H. 2019. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Bagi Penerima Bantuan Siswa Miskin (BSM) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) di SMA Negeri 1 Raren Batuah Kabupaten Barito Timur. Jurnal of Applied Informatics and Computing (JAIC) [internet].[diakses 29 November 2020]. 3(2): 114-118. Tersedia pada: https:// jurnal.polibatam.ac.id/index.php/JAIC/article/view/1752

Dzulhaq, M.I., Sutarman dan Wulandari, S. 2017. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa Baru dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting di SMK Kusuma Bangsa. Jurnal Sisfotek Global [internet]. [diakses 29 November 2020]. 7(2): 50-55. Tersedia pada: https://journal. stmikglobal.ac.id/index.php/sisfotek/article/view/151

Febriyati, M.N., Sophan, M.K. dan Yunitarini, R. 2016. Perbandingan SAW dan TOPSIS untuk Open Recruitment Warga Laboratorium Teknik Informatika di Universitas Turnojoyo Madura. Jurnal SimanteC [internet].[diakses 31 Oktober 2020]. 5(3): 133-142. Tersedia pada: https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id /simantec/article/view/2348

Kirana, Y., Iqbal, M. dan Yanto, I.K.F. 2018. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Beasiswa Miskin pada SMP Negeri 22 Tangerang Menggunakan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS. Jurnal Sisfotek Global [internet].[diakses 15 Oktober 2020]. 8(2): 56-66. Tersedia pada: https://journal.stmikglo bal.ac.id/index.php/sisfotek/article/view/191

Putri, L.R. 2020. Pengaruh Pariwisata Terhadap Peningkatan PDRB Kota Surakarta. Cakra Wisata [internet].[diakses 03 Juli 2021]. 21(1): 43-49. Tersedia pada: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ cakra-wisata/article/viewFile/ 41082/ 27019

Sunarti 2019. Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Tujuan Wisata di Jawa Barat. Techno.COM [internet].[diakses 31 Oktober 2020]. 18(1): 76-87. Tersedia pada: https://publikasi.dinus. ac.id/index.php/technoc/article/download/2098/1455

Windarto, A.P. 2017. Implementasi Metode TOPSIS dan SAW dalam Memberikan Reward Pelanggan. Kumpulan Jurnal Ilmu Komputer (KLIK) [internet]. [diakses 10 Oktober 2020]. 4(1): 88-101. Tersedia pada: http://klik.ulm. ac.id/index.php/klik/article/view/73

Wiranata, A.D., Iwansyah, Budiyantara, A. dan Sani, A. 2020. Pemilihan Karyawan Teladan Menggunakan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS. Jurnal of Business and Audit Information Systems [internet]. [diakses 29 November 2020]. 3(1): 22-35. DOI: 10/3081/jbase.v3i1. 2060. Tersedia pada: https://journal.ubm.ac.id/index.php/jbase/article/download/2060/1685

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Nubatonis, E. (2021). PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP, TOPSIS DAN SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING UNTUK PEMILIHAN TEMPAT WISATA DI MANGGARAI TIMUR. Seminar Nasional & Konferensi Ilmiah Sistem Informasi, Informatika & Komunikasi, 224–233. Retrieved from https://publikasi.uyelindo.ac.id/index.php/semmau/article/view/232